Residents of Sheridan weighed in on a proposed Wyoming ballot initiative that would prohibit “artificial persons” – including corporations, nonprofits, unions and limited liability entities – from spending money on state campaigns, political parties or ballot measures. The poll, conducted by Sheridan Media, gathered 228 votes and found overwhelming support for the measure.
Poll results
Out of the 228 participants, 185 (81%) answered “definitely yes” to the question of whether they would support such a proposal in Wyoming. An additional 26 voters (11%) said they would “probably yes,” bringing total affirmative sentiment to 92%.
Only a small minority expressed opposition: six respondents (3%) chose “probably no,” five (2%) selected “definitely no,” and another six (3%) remained undecided.
What the measure seeks to change
Ballot measure I-94 in neighboring Montana currently bars corporations, unions and other artificial persons from spending on state political activities. The Wyoming proposal would adopt a similar framework, aiming to increase transparency in campaign financing by eliminating anonymous corporate and union contributions. Wealthy individuals would still be permitted to give, but their donations would no longer be anonymous.
Supporters argue that the restriction would curb the outsized influence of special interest groups on state politics, ensuring that elected officials remain accountable to everyday Wyoming voters rather than to well‑funded organizations. They also contend that requiring disclosure of individual contributions would promote honesty and protect the integrity of the electoral process.
Community reaction
While the poll itself does not capture the full range of community opinions, the strong affirmative response suggests that many Sheridan residents are concerned about the role of money in politics and are eager for reforms that promote transparency. Local civic groups have noted that the measure aligns with broader efforts across the Mountain West to limit corporate influence in state elections.
Critics of the proposal, though not represented in the poll numbers, often raise concerns that restricting corporate speech could infringe on First Amendment rights. They also warn that limiting contributions from organizations might reduce the resources available for voter education and issue advocacy.
Next steps
The Wyoming Legislature would need to consider the proposal before it could appear on a future ballot. If the measure advances, it would likely be subject to public hearings, stakeholder testimony and further voter outreach. Residents interested in the development of this initiative are encouraged to follow local news outlets and attend any upcoming town‑hall meetings.
In the meantime, Sheridan Media has posted a follow‑up poll asking residents how they plan to vote on Wyoming’s Proposition 1, a separate measure that would provide a 50% homeowner property‑tax exemption this November. Community engagement on both issues underscores the active role Sheridan citizens are taking in shaping state policy.
Original reporting: Sheridan Media (Sheridan WY) — read the source article.
