During a recent work session on May 19, the Frisco City Council and city staff evaluated updated plans for a proposed 21,000-square-foot animal services facility. The project, initially estimated at $12.8 million, could now cost up to $24 million, according to Ken Schmidt, Frisco’s director of special projects. The increase is attributed to the facility’s larger size, rapid cost escalation, and evolving design assumptions.
Funding and Operational Plans
The council is considering hiring a design team and construction manager at risk, alongside shifting the project’s funding and operational model. The Frisco Community Development Corp. is set to provide an initial $12.8 million, with recommendations to combine cash and debt funding to avoid impacting existing projects. Schmidt emphasized the preference for a privately operated facility to reduce operating costs, estimating annual expenses between $550,000 and $650,000, compared to over $950,000 for a city-run model.
Impact of County Shelter Relationship
The proposed facility’s plans are influenced by Frisco’s relationship with the Collin County Animal Shelter. Currently, Frisco’s Animal Services division utilizes the county shelter in McKinney. However, the county has indicated an intent not to renew its shelter service agreement with Frisco, potentially ending services by November 2028. This development necessitates Frisco to plan for a facility that could handle all shelter services locally.
Council member Laura Rummel noted the need for Frisco to efficiently manage the transition, highlighting potential improvements in service levels by having a local facility. Discussions about extending the current agreement with the county are ongoing, with alternative plans being explored if an extension is not feasible.
Exploring Regional Collaboration
Several council members have proposed the idea of creating a regional animal facility to serve Frisco and neighboring communities like Prosper and Celina. Schmidt acknowledged that such a move would require significant changes to the current plans.
Site and Cost Considerations
To manage costs, city officials are considering relocating the facility from its initially proposed site at Preston Road and PGA Parkway to Gateway Drive and PGA Parkway, which presents fewer construction challenges. Alternative construction methods, such as pre-engineered metal buildings, are also under consideration to reduce expenses.
The city is exploring various revenue-generating options, including sponsorships, donations, and potential impound, adoption, and license fees. More information about the proposed facility is available on the city’s website.
Original reporting: Community Impact — Frisco — read the source article.
