Milford, Connecticut, has become a focal point for opposition to Flock cameras, which have been installed in various locations throughout the town. The cameras, which are motion-activated and use AI to log license plates and other vehicle identifiers, have sparked concerns among residents about privacy and civil rights.

Local Opposition

At a recent town meeting, residents and local candidates from both major parties spoke out against the cameras. Tony de Blasio, a resident and former Marine, stated, “All these Flock cameras have nothing to do with safety! They have to do with control!” Democrat Andrew Rice and Republican Chris Lancia also expressed their opposition to the cameras, with Rice quoting Benjamin Franklin and Lancia suggesting that police officers, rather than cameras, should be used to address crime.

Milford police chief Keith Mello, who proposed the cameras, defended their use, citing the need for additional resources to combat crime. However, state leaders, including Senate Majority Leader Bob Duff and State Senator James Maroney, have spoken out against the cameras, describing them as an invasive technology that raises concerns about who is watching and why.

State Response

The state of Connecticut will conduct a survey on the number of cameras and how they are used, with the goal of strengthening protection acts and technology regulations in 2027. In the meantime, Milford officials have voted to consider a moratorium on the cameras next month.

Original reporting: The Connecticut Mirror — read the source article.