The US and Iran are currently engaged in negotiations, but the details of these talks are not entirely clear. Tony Katz recently spoke with Major Mike Lyons, a retired US Army military analyst, to break down the intricacies of the Iran deal and its implications for the region.

Negotiations and Enforceability

Major Lyons expressed skepticism about the Memorandum of Understanding (MoU) between the US and Iran, citing concerns about enforceability. He noted that the Iranians have already shown a lack of commitment to the agreement, with the Straits of Hormuz being closed and then reopened, creating confusion and uncertainty.

The role of the Vice President in the negotiations was also discussed, with Major Lyons suggesting that the Vice President’s optimism about the deal may be misplaced. He argued that the Iranians are not people who will show their cards or admit to anything, making it difficult to determine their true intentions.

Ballistic Missiles and Regional Stability

The issue of ballistic missiles was also touched on, with Major Lyons arguing that the Iranians should not be allowed to have a large-scale ballistic missile capability. He noted that this poses a threat to regional stability and could be used to deliver nuclear weapons.

Major Lyons also discussed the US military presence in the region, noting that the US has a significant military presence, but that it’s unclear what the President’s intentions are. He emphasized that the military is not just a ‘light switch’ that can be turned on and off, and that the US needs to have a clear strategy for the region.

New Alliances and Regional Cooperation

The conversation also delved into the topic of new alliances and the potential for a ‘new NATO’ in the Middle East. Major Lyons suggested that the US may look to create a new alliance with Middle Eastern countries, including Bahrain, the UAE, and Saudi Arabia, to counter the Iranian threat.

Original reporting: 93.1 WIBC (Indianapolis) — read the source article.