In Spokane, Washington, a jury has reached a verdict in the case of the ‘Spokane Three,’ finding them guilty of federal conspiracy charges related to a protest at the local ICE facility in June 2025. The individuals, Jac Archer, Bajun Mavalwalla II, and Justice Forall, were arrested after attempting to prevent the transportation of two Venezuelan men to an ICE detention center in Tacoma.
Trial and Defense Arguments
The trial, which lasted nearly two weeks, centered on whether the actions of the three constituted a conspiracy to impede or injure officers. The defense argued that the protestors had no intention of causing harm and that their presence was motivated by compassion for the individuals facing detention. Justice Forall stated they were not part of any group intending to be arrested for civil disobedience, while Mavalwalla’s counsel emphasized his client’s past military service and lack of encouragement for violent actions. Archer’s defense highlighted efforts to maintain safety during the protest.
Prosecution’s Case
The prosecution presented video evidence suggesting coordinated communication among the protestors, arguing that officers felt reasonably threatened despite attempts to de-escalate the situation verbally. The jury’s decision reflects the weight given to this evidence over the defense’s claims of peaceful intent.
Reactions to the Verdict
Following the verdict, Bajun Mavalwalla’s father addressed supporters, expressing outrage over the characterization of his son as an ‘insurrectionist’ given his military background. Spokane Mayor Lisa Brown also criticized the prosecution, suggesting it was politically motivated to suppress dissent against federal immigration policies. She emphasized the importance of the right to peacefully protest as a cornerstone of democracy.
This case continues to stir discussions about the balance between protest rights and law enforcement duties, particularly in the context of contentious immigration policies. The community remains divided on the implications of the verdict, with ongoing debates about the role of civil disobedience in effecting policy change.
Original reporting: KREM Spokane — read the source article.
