U.S. Sen. Chris Murphy, D-Conn., has expressed doubts about the legitimacy of a preliminary deal to end hostilities in Iran. The deal, which was announced by the Trump administration, has not been shared with lawmakers, leaving many questioning its existence and terms.

Deal Details Unclear

The Trump administration signed a memorandum of understanding with Iran on Sunday, but the details of the agreement have not been made public. Murphy, a vocal critic of the war, has pushed for Congress to weigh in on the deal, citing its constitutional authority to declare war.

Other lawmakers, including U.S. Rep. Jim Himes, D-4th District, have also expressed concerns about the lack of transparency surrounding the deal. The administration has promised to provide more information in the coming days, but many are skeptical about the deal’s terms and the potential for side deals.

Concerns About Side Deals

Murphy has speculated that the possibility of side deals could dictate the terms of the agreement. He has also questioned the administration’s characterization of the deal, citing mixed signals between the administration and Iranian officials.

The deal’s impact on the region and the U.S. economy is also a concern. The effective closure of the Strait of Hormuz has led to a spike in oil and gas prices, which could have significant implications for the upcoming midterm elections.

Original reporting: The Connecticut Mirror — read the source article.