San Diego Gas & Electric (SDG&E) is under scrutiny for its opposition to ‘balcony solar’ systems, which allow residents to reduce electricity costs by plugging small solar panels into home outlets. This opposition comes despite the fact that three states have already approved such systems, with legislation pending in others.

Background on Rooftop Solar

Historically, SDG&E has opposed rooftop solar, arguing that it unfairly benefits homeowners over renters and those without the financial means to install solar systems. This stance has led to reduced incentives and additional fees for rooftop solar users, despite the initial promise of rebates and the ability to sell excess power back to the grid.

SDG&E, part of the for-profit SEMPRA, profits from building energy infrastructure rather than selling energy itself. This creates a financial incentive to oppose systems that reduce the need for new infrastructure, such as rooftop and now balcony solar.

The Case Against Balcony Solar

SDG&E argues that balcony solar could pose risks to electrical workers, a claim that critics find questionable. The utility’s consistent opposition to homeowner-generated solar power suggests a focus on maintaining its profit model rather than expanding consumer access to renewable energy.

Balcony solar offers a low-cost solution for renters and condo owners to participate in solar energy savings, challenging SDG&E’s previous arguments about equity. However, SDG&E’s new safety concerns appear to be another tactic to limit consumer-generated solar power.

As the debate continues, the question remains whether SDG&E’s actions are truly about safety and equity or primarily driven by profit motives.

Original reporting: Voice of San Diego — read the source article.