Graham Platner, a Democratic candidate for the U.S. Senate from Maine, is under scrutiny after allegations surfaced regarding a tattoo on his chest that is said to have Nazi associations. The controversy intensified when text messages from a former girlfriend, Lyndsey Fifield, indicated she knew about the tattoo’s significance months before Platner claims he did.

Controversial Tattoo

Appearing on MSNBC, Platner addressed the issue, stating he was unaware of the symbol’s Nazi connections when he got the tattoo during his time in the Marine Corps. He explained that he only learned of its significance last October. However, Fifield’s messages from August 2025 describe the tattoo as a ‘Totenkopf,’ a symbol used by Nazi SS units.

Platner expressed confusion over how Fifield could have known about the tattoo’s meaning before he did. He maintained that he had not been informed by anyone about its associations until recently. Despite the resurfacing of this issue, Platner’s campaign continues to support his past denials of any wrongdoing.

Past Allegations and Denials

The New York Times report that brought the tattoo controversy back into the spotlight also included allegations from Fifield about Platner’s past behavior. She claimed he was aware of the tattoo’s meaning years ago and recounted instances of physical intimidation. Platner has denied these allegations, attributing them to political motivations.

Platner acknowledged struggling with undiagnosed PTSD and alcohol use during a difficult period in his life but refuted any claims of physical abuse. He emphasized his efforts to improve himself and his commitment to his campaign in Maine.

Platner’s defense includes his history of passing security clearances and the lack of concerns raised by family members, including Jewish relatives, over the tattoo. He argues that these factors support his claim of ignorance regarding the tattoo’s Nazi associations.

Original reporting: KRDO (Colorado Springs metro) — read the source article.