By OBBM Network Editorial Staff

Derived from an episode of Sync-O-Wicz.

What happens when a state’s legal system appears to stall the very evidence needed to prove election fraud? The question drives a heated dialogue on the latest Sync-O-Wicz broadcast, where host Linda Szynkowicz and special guest unpack the tangled legal fights unfolding in Nevada and beyond.

Nevada’s Preservation Case: A Fight Over Evidence

The guest, representing himself pro se, described a courtroom showdown in which eight attorneys from the Attorney General’s office, along with the Secretary of State, were summoned to explain why election records had not been preserved. He noted that the judge had initially granted a preliminary injunction, only for the state to move to dismiss the original complaint. “They know the records are relevant,” he said, emphasizing that the opposition’s own documents admitted the importance of the data for any potential trial.

The crux of the dispute centers on a claim of spoliation—deliberate destruction of evidence. He argues that the counties’ refusal to retain records constitutes a knowing violation of court orders, undermining the ability of the court to assess alleged fraud. An upcoming hearing in October will determine whether the case proceeds or is dismissed entirely.

Colorado’s 2026 Election Timeline: Preparing for the Vote

Shifting focus, Szynkowicz highlighted the Colorado Secretary of State’s recent certification of the 2026 general election ballot. The state’s timeline offers voters a lengthy mail‑ballot window, beginning October 2 when county clerks may first send ballots. Subsequent deadlines include October 9 for the initial mail‑ballot dispatch, October 12 for required drop‑box openings, and October 26 as the cut‑off for registration and ballot return.

Szynkowicz urged voters to consider in‑person voting, noting that “after October 26 you have to vote in person,” a recommendation aimed at reducing reliance on mailed ballots and ensuring each legal vote is counted promptly.

Delaware’s Unusual Voting Privilege: A Hotel Gets a Ballot

In a surprising segment, the hosts discussed a Fenwick Island hotel that, according to a VoteBeat report, possesses a right to vote. The Fenwick Shores Hotel, a 65‑room property known for its rooftop pool and high‑end suites, was cited as having “the right to vote”—a claim that sparked both curiosity and skepticism among listeners.

While the legal basis for such corporate voting rights remains unclear, the story underscores the broader national debate over who should have a voice in elections and how voting regulations vary dramatically from state to state.

Strategic Legal Tactics and the Role of Expert Witnesses

He also referenced expert testimony from Mark Cook and Clay Perique, both of whom have submitted declarations supporting hand‑counting methods as a safeguard against electronic tabulation failures. He noted that Nevada law requires a hand count if an election cannot be certified, a process he believes reveals the system’s inherent error risk.

By positioning judges as “advocates” rather than neutral adjudicators, he argues that courts may inadvertently defer to state narratives, even when those narratives conflict with documented evidence. This perspective fuels his broader call for vigilance and legal action to protect electoral integrity.

Call to Action: Mobilizing Voters and Advocates

Throughout the program, Szynkowicz reminded viewers to sign a petition demanding that only U.S. citizens be permitted to vote, reinforcing the Fight Voter Fraud organization’s mission of “one vote for one legal voter.” She encouraged sharing the message across social platforms to broaden the reach of the campaign.

The discussion illustrates how legal battles, state‑specific voting schedules, and even quirky voting rights stories intertwine in the ongoing effort to secure transparent and accountable elections nationwide.

As the nation heads toward the 2026 elections, the outcomes of these court cases and the adherence to state voting timelines will play a pivotal role in shaping public confidence in the democratic process.

The full episode of Sync-O-Wicz is available on OBBM Network TV.