Camas high‑school runners are rallying behind Initiative 638, a statewide measure that will appear on the November 3 ballot. The initiative would require schools to enforce policies that prevent biological males from competing on female teams, thereby preserving the fairness that Title IX originally created for girls’ athletics.
Local athletes voice concern
Several Camas athletes spoke out about recent race results that they say demonstrate the problem. Lily Collett, a varsity runner, noted, “It troubles me that spots are being taken away from me at bigger meets like districts, regionals and state.” Sierra added, “If they don’t separate us, eventually all the top runners will be biological boys.” Analeigh and Frances, both varsity runners, said, “Biological men are competing in girls’ sports in Washington State, and it’s destroying fairness in girls’ sports.”
Recent race data
In the 2026 4A District 3&4 cross‑country championships, the top boys’ 5,000‑meter time was 14:54.7, while the top girls’ time was 18:03.3, illustrating a clear performance gap. Advocacy group HeCheated.org reported more than 2,538 top‑three finishes by biological males in girls’ K‑12 events across the state.
What Initiative 638 would do
The measure would amend state law to require schools to verify a student’s biological sex before allowing participation in female‑only athletic activities. Proponents argue that existing sports physicals already include sex verification and that a saliva test is available if needed. The initiative does not ban any student from playing sports; it simply bars biological males from competing on female teams.
Opposition and political context
Opponents, including Vancouver City Councilor Diana Perez, have raised concerns about gender‑verification methods, calling the requirement “invasive.” Perez, who is running for State Representative in the 17th Legislative District, voted to oppose the measure on Oct 5, 2026. Critics are largely affiliated with gender‑rights advocacy groups that argue the policy could discriminate against transgender youth.
Why the community supports the measure
Supporters emphasize that Title IX was intended to create athletic opportunities for girls, not to allow biological males to dominate female events. They point to the growing number of complaints from female athletes who feel their chances for scholarships and recognition are being eroded. By protecting the integrity of girls’ sports, Initiative 638 aims to safeguard the health, confidence, and competitive spirit of young women across Washington.
Next steps
Washington voters will decide on Initiative 638 on Nov 3. Local schools, parents, and athletes are expected to continue public outreach and education efforts in the weeks leading up to the vote.
Original reporting: Clark County Today (Vancouver WA) — read the source article.
