NEW BERN, N.C. – A federal judge on Friday pushed the arraignment of former FBI Director James Comey back to January 2027, marking the third postponement since the summer. The decision, issued by U.S. District Judge Louise Flanagan, also moves the trial start date to February, providing additional preparation time for both sides.
Judge’s Reasoning
In her order, Judge Flanagan wrote that “the ends of justice served by granting the requested continuance and setting arraignment in January 2027 outweigh the best interests of the public and defendant in a speedy trial.” She cited the gravity of the charges, pending motions, and the need for defense counsel to have more time to prepare as key factors.
Charges and Government Position
Comey faces two federal counts alleging threats against the president. Prosecutors argue that an objective viewer could interpret the social‑media post of seashells spelling “86 47” as a call to “Kill President Trump.” The government’s stance underscores the seriousness with which the Department of Justice is treating any language that could be seen as encouraging violence against the nation’s leader.
Details of the Controversial Post
According to the filing, Comey posted the arrangement while walking on a North Carolina beach and removed it shortly thereafter, claiming he did not realize the numbers might be read as a promotion of violence. Prosecutors note that two minutes before the post, Comey’s wife texted him a definition of “86” – meaning to get rid of or refuse service. The arrangement was located about four miles from the beachfront property where Comey was staying.
Social‑Media Reach
Comey’s Instagram account had an estimated 200,000 followers at the time of the post, and prosecutors estimate that secondary sharing could have reached millions of users. Text messages between Comey and his agent after the post indicate he did not intend a viral message, though he reportedly said, “I’ll be OK if it sells books.”
Legal Timeline
Judge Flanagan had originally set the arraignment for a Wednesday in June, with a trial slated for October 21. Prior to that, the arraignment was scheduled for June 30 and the trial for July 15. The latest continuance pushes the entire schedule forward by several months.
Implications
The postponement allows the government to continue its effort to protect the president from any perceived threats while ensuring the defendant receives adequate time to mount a defense. It also reflects the court’s recognition of the complex legal issues surrounding the case.
Next Steps
Both the prosecution and defense will have additional time to file motions and prepare arguments ahead of the January arraignment. The case remains under close watch as it involves the former head of the nation’s premier law‑enforcement agency and alleged threats against the sitting president.
Original reporting: KTBS 3 (Shreveport) — read the source article.
