A federal judge on Thursday issued a preliminary injunction that stops Montgomery County from enforcing its ban on firearms within 100 yards of a place of public assembly when it involves the Silver Spring Jewish Center and its rabbi, Menashe Shapiro. The ruling comes as the synagogue’s legal challenge to the county’s ordinance moves forward.
Background of the county ordinance
Montgomery County Executive Marc Elrich, a Democrat, signed the current version of the ordinance on July 27, 2026. The law prohibits the possession, sale, transfer, or transport of firearms within 100 yards of any place of public assembly, a definition that includes houses of worship. The county argued the measure was intended to increase public safety in densely populated areas.
Synagogue’s lawsuit
Rabbi Menashe Shapiro and the Orthodox congregation filed suit on July 30, three days after the ordinance took effect. In their complaint, they contend that the ban infringes on their constitutional right to keep and bear arms for self‑defense and violates the Free Exercise Clause by targeting a religious institution.
Judge’s decision
U.S. District Judge James C. McGann granted the preliminary injunction, stating that the plaintiffs have shown a likelihood of success on the merits of their constitutional claims and that they would suffer irreparable harm without immediate relief. The judge emphasized that the timing of the decision is “opportune,” noting that the injunction arrives just before the start of Rosh Hashana, the Jewish New Year, when many worshippers will gather at the synagogue.
Implications for the community
The ruling allows the Silver Spring Jewish Center to maintain its current security arrangements, which include licensed firearms for protection, while the case proceeds through the courts. Local residents and faith‑based groups have expressed relief that the synagogue can continue to meet safety needs during a major holiday.
County response
Montgomery County officials have indicated they will appeal the injunction. In a statement, the county’s legal counsel argued that the ordinance is a neutral public‑safety measure and that the injunction undermines the county’s ability to protect all residents from gun violence.
What’s next?
The case will move toward a full trial, during which both sides are expected to present extensive evidence on constitutional rights, public‑safety data, and the impact of the ordinance on religious communities. The outcome could set a precedent for how local gun‑restriction laws interact with religious‑freedom claims across the nation.
Original reporting: Alexandria, VA News – WTOP News — read the source article.
