King Charles III has decided not to move into Buckingham Palace after a 10-year, £369 million renovation. The palace will continue to serve as the administrative headquarters of the monarchy, hosting ceremonial and official functions, including receiving foreign dignitaries.
History of the Palace
Buckingham Palace has been the official London residence of the sovereign since 1837. Queen Victoria was the first monarch to live in the palace, moving in when she came to the throne nearly 200 years ago. Despite its rich history, the palace has undergone extensive remodeling over the years, including the addition of the east wing in 1847 and a refacing in 1913.
The latest conservation work began in 2017 and includes the replacement of aging electrical, plumbing, and mechanical services, as well as the removal of asbestos. The renovation is expected to be completed next year.
Reactions to the Decision
Critics have questioned the hefty cost of the renovation and King Charles’ decision not to move into the palace. Graham Smith, the chief executive of Republic, an anti-monarchy group in the UK, said, ‘The taxpayer has just funded a major refurbishment of Buckingham Palace, only for Charles to unilaterally decide he won’t use it.’ However, a palace spokesperson said that the king retains a deep affection for the palace and a respect for its role in royal and public life.
Original reporting: KEYT (Ventura/Santa Barbara) — read the source article.
