The Amalgamated Transit Union (ATU) Local 1356, which represents bus drivers and mechanics for Sioux Area Metro (SAM), filed a formal grievance this week against Via Transportation, the private contractor that manages the city’s public‑transit system. The union says Via is breaching the terms of its collective bargaining contract by altering driver schedules and reclassifying positions without proper negotiation.
Union raises concerns with employees
Patrick Baetsle, president of ATU Local 1356, has been meeting with rank‑and‑file employees throughout the week to discuss the scheduling changes. Drivers report that shifts are being adjusted on short notice, leading to unpredictable work hours and staffing gaps on routes. The union argues that these practices undermine the stability promised in the labor agreement and place undue strain on both drivers and the riders who rely on consistent service.
Background on the transit partnership
In 2024, the City of Sioux Falls ended its long‑standing relationship with a previous management firm and awarded the contract to Via Transportation. The city’s goal was to modernize its mass‑transit network, adding on‑demand micro‑transportation vans to supplement fixed‑route buses and expanding paratransit services for persons with disabilities. Via’s entry was marketed as a “revolution” in how the city delivers public transportation.
Since Via took over operations, the agency has introduced a flexible van‑based service that riders can request via a smartphone app. While the on‑demand model has been praised for increasing coverage in low‑density neighborhoods, the union says the shift has also created scheduling complexities for traditional bus operators.
Grievance details and next steps
The grievance cites specific contract language that requires any changes to driver classification or work schedules to be negotiated with the union. ATU claims Via has unilaterally re‑assigned drivers to the new van fleet and altered shift patterns without following the agreed‑upon process.
Via Transportation has not yet issued a public response. The grievance will be reviewed by the parties’ respective representatives, and if unresolved, may proceed to arbitration under the terms of the collective bargaining agreement.
Impact on riders and the community
Local commuters have expressed mixed reactions. Some appreciate the added flexibility of the on‑demand vans, while others worry that reduced driver availability on fixed routes could lead to longer wait times. Community leaders emphasize the importance of maintaining reliable service for families, seniors, and workers who depend on public transit for daily activities.
City officials have indicated they will monitor the dispute closely, noting that a stable transit workforce is essential to the city’s broader goals of economic development and reduced traffic congestion.
Looking ahead
The outcome of the grievance could set a precedent for how private contractors manage labor relations with public‑sector unions in South Dakota. Both the union and Via Transportation have signaled a willingness to negotiate, but the timeline for resolution remains uncertain.
Original reporting: The Dakota Scout (Sioux Falls) — read the source article.
