By OBBM Network Editorial Staff

David Iverson

Do you ever wonder why the word “moderate” seems to have vanished from political conversations? On a spirited Friday morning, host David Iverson tackled that very question, arguing that moderation is less a philosophy and more a sign of indecision.

Radio’s Resurgence and the Quest for Authentic Dialogue

Iverson opened the show by celebrating the revival of radio as a platform for unfiltered political discourse, a medium he believes can bridge the gap left by mainstream and social media. He likened the experience to “the synthesis of traditional radio and the freedom that comes from a live podcast,” positioning his program as a space where listeners can hear unvarnished viewpoints.

He also explained his journalistic approach, noting that “all journalists do that” when using anonymous sources, but he prefers “to sneak up on things” rather than announce his presence. This anecdote set the tone for a broadcast that would blend personal storytelling with hard‑line policy critique.

Defining the Non‑existent Moderate

Drawing on a quote from Rush Limbaugh, Iverson dismissed the idea of a moderate as “somebody that doesn’t know what they believe.” He extended the argument, claiming that anyone who claims moderation is simply “lick[ing] their finger, hold[ing] it up in the wind, and find[ing] out which way the wind is going.”

Iverson illustrated his point with concrete examples: supporting “killing babies” in any circumstance or “stealing money from people you don’t need.” He referenced Calvin Coolidge, paraphrasing, “anything above what is absolutely necessary is legalized larceny.” In Iverson’s view, taxing beyond what is needed for essential services is tantamount to theft.

Constitutional Purity vs. Policy Flexibility

Turning to state law, Iverson warned against attempts to circumvent the Wyoming Constitution. He cited two provisions that prohibit the state from loaning public credit to private corporations and from giving money to entities not under “absolute control of the state.” He used local examples, questioning whether a “kiddie shelter in Sheridan” or “the Nordic ski trails” meet that standard.

His critique extended to cultural debates, stating, “men cannot become women no more than a man can become a cat,” and labeling such positions as inherently non‑moderate. This blend of constitutional literalism and cultural commentary underscores the show’s broader theme: true conservatism is rooted in firm principles, not compromise.

Polling Data and the Rise of Democratic Socialism

Iverson quoted a recent Quinnipiac poll showing that “nearly 60% of Democrats support the DSA.” He highlighted the organization’s platform, which calls for drafting a new constitution, abolishing the Electoral College, and demilitarizing police departments. He expressed puzzlement over the term “demilitarize,” noting that police are already “a kind of militaristic type of entity.”

By juxtaposing these data points with his earlier constitutional arguments, Iverson painted a picture of a political landscape where the left’s ambitions clash with what he describes as the immutable text of the Constitution.

Implications for Wyoming and Beyond

Iverson concluded that the absence of genuine moderates hampers meaningful change. He suggested that “no moderate will ever change anything,” and that those who claim moderation are simply “trying to keep the status quo.” The host warned that relying on “purity tests” within the Republican Party, such as platform pledges, is not a flaw but a safeguard to ensure elected officials truly represent conservative values.

In a state where “the Trump administration” has championed policies aligning with these principles, Iverson’s remarks resonate with listeners who view steadfast adherence to constitutional limits and fiscal restraint as essential to Wyoming’s future.

The full episode of Cowboy State Politics is available on OBBM Network TV.