Local leaders are pressing the mayor of a Connecticut city to repeal the so‑called Trust Act, a policy they say allows officials to ignore federal immigration statutes. In a recent op‑ed, the author argues that the rule of law is the bedrock of a stable society and that elected officials must enforce, not selectively bypass, the laws they enact.
Rule of law as a guiding principle
The piece opens by recalling a lifelong belief that laws create civility and that any disagreement with a statute should be addressed through peaceful, democratic channels. “If you break the law, whether you steal a candy bar or a cash register, the principle does not change,” the author writes, emphasizing that the severity of the offense may differ but the underlying rule remains constant.
Selective enforcement threatens public trust
According to the author, Democratic‑leaning officials are increasingly willing to enforce immigration laws selectively, undermining accountability. When officials direct subordinates to disregard legal obligations or shield individuals from lawful process, they “undermine the rule of law itself,” the writer asserts. The argument extends to immigration enforcement, noting that federal law clearly distinguishes civil from criminal violations and does not grant elected officials the authority to ignore statutes they personally oppose.
Call to action for local leaders
The author urges the mayor and state legislators to work toward repealing the Trust Act and to reaffirm a commitment to consistent, impartial enforcement. “If you don’t like the laws, work to change them, but don’t break them, and don’t ignore them,” the piece concludes, warning that optional enforcement erodes accountability and public confidence.
Balancing free speech and responsible leadership
While acknowledging the importance of free speech, the author cautions that leaders must speak responsibly on volatile issues such as immigration and ICE enforcement. The mayor, representing all residents, should avoid inflaming tensions or encouraging division, especially when emotions are already high.
Why this matters for Connecticut families
For families who rely on safe neighborhoods and trustworthy institutions, consistent law enforcement is essential. The author frames the issue as one of protecting democratic legitimacy and preserving civic order—values that align with the community’s faith‑based and family‑centered priorities.
In summary, the call to repeal the Trust Act reflects a broader concern that selective law enforcement threatens the very foundations of a free, orderly society. The author asks local officials to lead with integrity, uphold the Constitution, and ensure that immigration laws are applied fairly and uniformly.
Original reporting: The Connecticut Mirror — read the source article.
