Utah Valley University (UVU) and the State of Utah have been served with a notice of claim filed by the family of Charlie Kirk, the founder of Turning Point USA. The filing, dated September 9, alleges that the university failed to provide adequate security for the amphitheater where Kirk was scheduled to speak on September 10, 2025, a failure the family says contributed to his death.
Allegations of security negligence
According to the claim, Turning Point USA warned UVU police about the security risks posed by nearby rooftops that overlook the amphitheater. In response, a university police chief reportedly texted a Turning Point staff member, “I got you covered.” The family contends that despite this assurance, UVU police did not control access to the rooftop from which the fatal shot was fired.
Details of the shooting
Prosecutors have identified 23‑year‑old Tyler Robinson, a former electrical apprentice, as the shooter. Robinson allegedly fired from the roof of UVU’s student resource center and is now facing a death‑penalty trial. The prosecution alleges that Robinson’s motive stemmed from a personal dispute involving his boyfriend’s consideration of gender transition and Kirk’s public opposition to gay marriage and transgender rights.
Robinson’s defense attorney, Richard Novak, has stressed that Kirk’s outspoken views do not constitute legal motive. Novak told the court that while Kirk “spoke harshly” about non‑heterosexual lifestyles, there is no direct evidence linking those statements to the shooting.
Legal proceedings
The lawsuit seeks damages for what the family describes as a “failure of duty” by UVU police. A hearing on the claim is scheduled for October 23, and the family hopes the case will prompt a review of campus security protocols.
Utah’s attorney general’s office and UVU have not yet responded to requests for comment. The university’s administration has indicated that it will cooperate with any lawful investigation.
Community response
The filing has sparked discussion among local residents and campus stakeholders about the balance between free speech and safety on university grounds. Many parents and community leaders have expressed concern that insufficient security could endanger speakers and students alike.
While the case is still pending, the Kirk family’s action underscores a broader call for universities to reassess safety measures, especially when hosting high‑profile speakers who may attract controversy.
Original reporting: Appleton, WI News Feed (HLL/CB) — read the source article.
