On Thursday, the Fresno County Board of Supervisors voted 3‑2 to approve a 300‑foot deep blast mine on the banks of the San Joaquin River. The decision was split along party lines, with the three Republican supervisors – Garry Bredefeld, Buddy Mendes and Nathan Magsig – supporting the project, while Democratic supervisors Brian Pacheco and Luis Chavez voted against it.
Recommendation from State Wildlife Agency Overruled
The California Department of Fish and Wildlife (CDFW) had issued an in‑person recommendation to reject the mining proposal, citing a “catastrophic risk” to a billion‑dollar investment in the San Joaquin salmon run. State officials noted that such a recommendation had never been ignored on a project of this nature.
Funding Deal Influences Vote
Key swing vote supervisor Garry Bredefeld secured a commitment from CEMEX to provide up to an additional $150,000 per year for Fresno’s road maintenance. Bredefeld also serves on the San Joaquin River Board Conservancy, a fact noted by observers monitoring potential conflicts of interest.
Project Details and Controversy
The approved blast mine would involve controlled explosions to extract material from the riverbank, a method that critics argue could destabilize the river’s ecosystem and threaten the salmon population. Proponents argue the project will create jobs and generate revenue for the county.
Local Reaction
Environmental groups and some community members have expressed concern over the potential impact on water quality and fish habitats. The CDFW’s warning highlighted the importance of protecting the salmon run, which supports both ecological balance and a multi‑million‑dollar recreational fishing industry.
Next Steps
The board’s approval moves the project forward to the permitting stage, where additional environmental reviews and public comment periods will take place. Opponents plan to continue voicing their objections through public hearings and legal channels.
What This Means for Fresno County
Supporters see the decision as a step toward economic development and infrastructure improvement, citing the road‑funding agreement with CEMEX as a tangible benefit for local taxpayers. Critics warn that the long‑term environmental costs could outweigh short‑term financial gains.
Original reporting: Fresnoland — read the source article.
