Jennifer Simonetti, the former head coach of the University of Akron women’s soccer team, filed a lawsuit on Nov. 4 alleging that the university terminated her in retaliation for filing a Title IX discrimination complaint. Simonetti, who was hired in July 2022 and dismissed in May 2025, says she experienced disparate treatment because of her gender, including unequal work conditions and inferior institutional support compared to male coaches and the men’s soccer program.
Allegations and legal filings
Simonetti’s complaint asserts that after she lodged a Title IX grievance, the university placed her on paid administrative leave in February 2025 and then fired her less than a month later. She has filed discrimination charges with the Ohio Civil Rights Commission and the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission, both of which issued notices earlier this summer that she may pursue her claims in state or federal court.
The lawsuit, which seeks a jury trial, asks for back pay and compensatory damages. It also alleges that the university’s internal investigation—though not referenced in the filing—found Simonetti dismissed athletes’ injuries, forced them back onto the field prematurely, and criticized them for seeking medical attention. Anonymous complaints about her coaching style reportedly date back to 2023.
Performance record and prior experience
During Simonetti’s three‑season tenure, the Zips posted an overall record of 11‑32‑9. Before joining Akron, she spent three seasons as head coach of Case Western Reserve University’s women’s soccer program and held coaching positions at Eastern Oregon University, Marietta College, University of Massachusetts Lowell, Oberlin College, Westfield State University, and Chatham University.
University response
Signal Akron has reached out to the University of Akron and to Simonetti’s attorney, Gregory Napolitano, for comment. The university has not yet provided a public response to the lawsuit.
Context of Title IX and employment rights
Title IX of the Education Amendments of 1972 prohibits sex‑based discrimination in any education program or activity receiving federal funding. The law is often invoked in cases where employees allege retaliation after reporting discrimination. Ohio’s civil rights agencies are responsible for investigating such claims and may refer matters to the courts when appropriate.
Legal experts note that retaliation claims can be difficult to prove, requiring evidence that the adverse employment action was directly linked to the protected activity. The timing of Simonetti’s termination—shortly after filing her Title IX complaint—will likely be a focal point in the case.
Implications for the university and local athletics
If the court finds in favor of Simonetti, the university could face significant financial liability and may be required to revise its policies regarding gender equity and coach oversight. The case also highlights broader concerns about how collegiate athletic departments handle complaints of discrimination and athlete safety.
Local supporters of the Zips and advocates for gender equity in sports are watching the lawsuit closely, emphasizing the importance of fair treatment for women’s athletic programs and the need for transparent processes when complaints arise.
Next steps
The lawsuit is set for a jury trial, though a settlement could be reached before court proceedings begin. Both parties are expected to exchange further evidence and testimony in the coming months.
Original reporting: Signal Akron — read the source article.
