Chicago’s City Council is still debating whether to allow video gambling terminals in the city, six months after they were legalized in the 2026 budget. The controversy surrounding the machines has sparked a heated discussion among council members, with some arguing that they provide a much-needed revenue source for struggling bars and restaurants, while others claim that they run afoul of a city agreement over the Bally’s River West casino project.

Concerns Over Public Safety

Some council members have expressed concerns over the potential impact of video gambling terminals on public safety, citing the increased risk of burglaries and other crimes. According to data from the Illinois Gaming Board, video gaming burglaries in Illinois have increased every year for five years, with 473 reported in 2025. Ald. Matt O’Shea (19th) noted that four businesses in his ward were approved for licensing on June 11, but he also acknowledged the need for extra safety precautions.

Business owners who have been approved for video gambling terminals argue that they will provide a financial boost to their establishments. Bill Guide, owner of Cork and Kerry, said that his business is losing customers to the suburbs where video gaming is offered. He hopes that the terminals will provide financial relief to the city and to local businesses.

Bally’s Opposition

Representatives from Bally’s have argued that legalizing video gambling terminals breaches an agreement the casino reached with the city. Christopher Kewett, Bally’s vice president for Corporate Development, said that legalized video gambling terminals will hurt the city’s finances for years to come. He also warned that other corporations may take note of the city’s treatment of Bally’s and reconsider bringing businesses and jobs to the city.

Original reporting: Block Club Chicago — read the source article.