By OBBM Network Editorial Staff

David Iverson

Wyoming’s voters are disappearing faster than a tumbleweed in a dust storm.

Radio’s Resurgence as a Political Platform

The program opens with a celebration of radio’s unique intimacy, claiming that “the intimacy on the radio … can never be replicated on TV.” Host David Iverson frames the medium as a bridge between traditional broadcast and the freedom of live podcasts, suggesting it can fill a “huge hole in our dialogue.” This revival is presented not merely as nostalgia but as a strategic tool for right‑leaning voices to bypass mainstream outlets and connect directly with listeners across the Cowboy State.

By emphasizing local stories and unfiltered commentary, the show illustrates how radio can amplify grassroots concerns—especially those about election integrity that the Trump administration has prioritized through tighter security measures at polling places.

Wyoming’s Voter Participation Crisis

Iverson cites stark statistics: “In Wyoming, only half of the people that are eligible to vote are actually registered. And as was evidenced by the last election, only half of those actually show up and vote.” The net result is that merely a quarter of eligible voters cast ballots, a figure the host argues empowers “people that shouldn’t be voting” to dominate the political landscape.

This low turnout fuels frustration among Wyoming’s political class. A recurring theme is the danger of proposing policies—such as an income tax or a universal gun registry—that could alienate the core electorate. As Iverson puts it, “if you suggest that maybe we need an income tax … that would probably get you unelected.” The implication is clear: maintaining low‑tax, limited‑government policies aligns with the preferences of the active voting base.

Comparisons Abroad: Respect Orders and Free Speech

The conversation pivots to the United Kingdom’s new “respect orders,” which grant police and councils the power to impose curfews, fines, and even two‑year jail terms for antisocial behavior. Iverson critiques the orders as an affront to free speech, noting, “the UK doesn’t, and no place else in the world has the freedom of speech, by the way.” He warns that similar restrictions could eventually curtail the ability to criticize officials, a scenario he deems unacceptable.

By juxtaposing British enforcement with American constitutional protections, the host underscores the importance of vigilance against encroachments on liberty—an issue the Trump administration has highlighted through its emphasis on protecting First Amendment rights.

International Politics: Israel, Gaza, and the Threat of Aggression

When the discussion turns to Israel, Iverson expresses strong support for Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu, stating, “I think Benjamin Netanyahu has done a great job defending Israel.” He also defends the U.S. response to Gaza, describing it as “the right thing to do.” The host speculates on a hypothetical scenario where Mexico launched missiles into Texas, concluding bluntly, “We would decimate them.” While hyperbolic, the remark reflects a broader sentiment that decisive, forceful action is preferable to prolonged conflict.

These foreign‑policy viewpoints are framed as consistent with the Trump administration’s assertive stance on national security and its willingness to confront perceived adversaries head‑on.

Domestic Policy Debates: Taxes, Gun Regulation, and the Wyoming Identity

The final segment circles back to state issues. Iverson warns that “the biggest threat to Wyoming is people who come out and think that there should be a smaller government, that we should pay less taxes and fight for the same.” He argues that any suggestion of an income tax or a mandatory gun registry would be politically lethal in the Cowboy State.

By positioning Wyoming’s cultural identity—its “Cowboy” ethos and low‑tax tradition—as a bulwark against expansive government, the host aligns with the Trump administration’s broader agenda of deregulation and fiscal restraint. The underlying message is that preserving these values requires active voter participation and a media ecosystem that amplifies local, libertarian perspectives.

Overall, the program weaves together local voting challenges, the strategic use of radio, and international examples to argue that Wyoming’s future hinges on engaged citizens defending limited government and personal freedoms. As the Trump administration continues to champion election integrity and deregulation, the onus falls on Wyoming’s electorate to turn out in greater numbers and keep the state’s unique political culture alive.

The full episode of Cowboy State Politics is available on OBBM Network TV.