By OBBM Network Editorial Staff

Derived from an episode of Securing America.

What does it mean when the leader of the world’s most powerful communist party sits across the table from the President of the United States, while that same party is accused of plotting a biological attack on America? The question drives a tense conversation on Securing America, where host Frank Gaffney and guest George Raisley examine the implications of President Trump’s two‑day state visit by Chinese President Xi Jinping.

The Historical Threat of a Red China

Raisley frames the danger with a reference to a 2003 secret speech by then‑defense minister Chi Hao‑Chien, in which he allegedly outlined a plan to use biological weapons to depopulate the United States. “Around 2003, a general named Chi Hao‑Chien… described their leadership’s plan is to use biological weapons to depopulate the United States,” Raisley said, noting that the COVID‑19 pandemic served as a “proof‑of‑concept test of their low‑tech biological weapons attack.” He argues the pandemic killed “a million‑plus Americans” and inflicted “disastrous economic consequences” that advance Beijing’s strategic goals.

According to Raisley, the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) treats the loss of its own citizens as “acceptable collateral damage” in pursuit of a global revolutionary agenda. This perspective, he says, underpins the CCP’s willingness to weaponize both disease and data against the United States.

Trump’s Diplomatic Calculus

Gaffney acknowledges the paradox of President Trump’s public praise for Xi while simultaneously warning of a communist threat. “I have observed over the course of Trump’s political rise that he tends to lavish the greatest praise sometimes on our worst enemies,” Gaffney notes, describing the president’s diplomatic style as a “head shaker” that nevertheless serves a strategic purpose.

The host suggests that Trump’s approach is rooted in pragmatic concerns: securing rare‑earth minerals and other critical resources essential to the national economy. Raisley adds, “Those two commodities are absolutely essential to our national well‑being and our economic well‑being,” implying that short‑term concessions may be weighed against long‑term security risks.

The Red‑Green Axis: A New Hybrid Threat

Both men warn that the CCP is not acting alone. Raisley introduces the concept of a “Red‑Green Axis,” where Chinese communists collaborate with jihadist and Sharia‑supremacist groups. He references a recent Trump speech that allegedly disclosed “millions of dollars” flowing from the CCP to these extremist organizations, a financial pipeline that could influence U.S. elections.

“They are putting election‑deciding kind of resources into this,” Raisley says, emphasizing that the alliance amplifies the threat to American democratic institutions.

Voter Data, Phantom Ballots, and Election Integrity

The conversation turns to a chilling claim that the CCP has accessed “on the order of 200 million” American voter records. Raisley outlines two scenarios: a “legitimate side” where campaign PACs use the data to target pro‑China candidates, and an “illegitimate side” where the data enables the creation of fraudulent or phantom ballots.

“That could be decisive in any election,” he warns, noting that recent congressional races have been decided by margins as narrow as five percent, with some contests decided by fewer than a thousand votes. “I’ve been involved in campaigns that were decided by four votes,” Raisley adds, underscoring how vulnerable tight races are to data‑driven manipulation.

What This Means for Americans

The dialogue concludes with a call for vigilance. Gaffney argues that the American public is not “as dumb as the establishment media would like to believe” and that many recognize the inherent danger of engaging with a regime that has historically targeted its own people.

Raisley agrees, urging citizens to demand transparency and robust safeguards against foreign data exploitation. “We have to take another break here and address the question,” he says, urging policymakers to act before the next election cycle.

In sum, the conversation on Securing America highlights a stark reality: diplomatic overtures to China cannot be divorced from the broader strategic contest over health, technology, and the very integrity of American elections. As the Trump administration navigates this delicate balance, the stakes remain high for every voter and every institution tasked with defending the nation’s democratic foundations.

The full episode of Securing America is available on OBBM Network TV.