Fresno County residents will see Measure S, the proposed transportation tax known as the “Better Roads, Safe Streets” initiative, on the November ballot after a state court decision on Monday. Fresno County Superior Court Judge Jonathan Skiles found that Assembly Bill 1923, which authorized the statewide placement of the measure, does not violate California law.
Court Ruling Details
In his written opinion, Judge Skiles affirmed that AB 1923 is both valid and enforceable, rejecting the Fresno County Board of Supervisors’ request for relief. The board had argued that the Legislature’s last‑minute amendment raised constitutional concerns by superseding the county’s authority to manage its own ballot measures.
Judge Skiles concluded that the state’s action was within its statutory powers and that the county’s challenge did not demonstrate a legal basis for overturning the law. Consequently, all avenues for an injunction or other remedy were denied.
Board of Supervisors’ Response
Following the ruling, Board Chair Garry Bredefeld issued a statement acknowledging the decision while continuing to criticize Measure S. Bredefeld said the board respects the judge’s ruling and will not pursue an appeal. He noted that the board had complied with California election law in its study of the measure and expressed frustration that the proponents of the tax had not followed proper signature‑collection procedures.
“I respect Judge Skiles, believe he gave all sides a fair opportunity to present their arguments, and accept his decision,” Bredefeld said. “The Board of Supervisors followed California election law when it exercised its statutory authority to study Measure S, and we believed the Legislature’s last‑minute attempt to change the rules raised serious constitutional questions. We made our case. If the proponents had correctly collected their signatures and not required the Clerk to hand‑count them, this delay would never have happened. Nevertheless, the Court has ruled, we accept that ruling, and we will not appeal this decision.”
What Measure S Proposes
Measure S would impose a countywide transportation tax intended to fund road repairs, street safety improvements, and related infrastructure projects. Proponents argue that the additional revenue is necessary to address aging roadways and to enhance public safety for drivers and pedestrians alike.
Opponents, including several members of the Board of Supervisors, have raised concerns about the tax’s impact on taxpayers and question the process by which the measure was placed on the ballot.
Next Steps for Voters
With the court’s decision final, the measure will appear on the November ballot, giving Fresno County voters the opportunity to decide its fate. Voter education efforts are expected to increase as the election approaches, with both supporters and opponents planning outreach campaigns.
Residents who wish to learn more about Measure S can review the official voter guide, attend upcoming public forums, or contact the Fresno County Elections Office for additional information.
Original reporting: Fresnoland — read the source article.
