Four men identified in a civil lawsuit filed by a former Cornell University student have formally joined a court petition that seeks to remove New York Attorney General Letitia James from the criminal investigation she is leading. The petition argues that James’ earlier social‑media posts, in which she expressed empathy for the alleged victim and condemned the assault, create a conflict of interest.
Background of the case
The lawsuit, filed in September, alleges that several men raped a student at a fraternity party in 2024. The plaintiff, identified in court documents as Jane Doe, claims the men pressured her to use ketamine and marijuana and that she was heavily intoxicated from alcohol, rendering her unable to consent. Not every man named in the suit is accused of rape, but the allegations have prompted a criminal investigation.
Attorney General’s involvement
Governor Kathy Hochul appointed James as special prosecutor on Oct. 1 after the local district attorney declined to bring charges in 2024. James posted on X and Facebook on Sept. 28, writing, “I’m holding her in my heart and in my prayers. To her, and to all survivors: you’re not alone. We stand with you.” At an Oct. 8 debate, she defended the posts, saying they demonstrate empathy that the nation needs.
Effort to remove James
One of the accused men previously filed a motion to have James removed, and a judge set a deadline for the other defendants to decide whether to join the effort. Four men have now agreed to be added to the petition, including one who had already filed paperwork seeking James’ removal. Two other defendants did not respond.
State’s response
State lawyers argued that Governor Hochul has broad authority to appoint special prosecutors and highlighted James’ track record handling high‑profile, sensitive cases. They maintain that her appointment is lawful and appropriate.
Administration’s perspective
Attorney General James expressed confidence in the newly appointed outside counsel, former federal prosecutor Jacqueline Kelly, stating that Kelly will lead a “fair and comprehensive investigation.” Andrew Miltenberg, counsel for the man spearheading the removal effort, acknowledged that Kelly’s appointment changes the face of the investigation but does not alter ultimate authority.
What’s next
The judge has not yet ruled on the motion to remove James, pending confirmation that the remaining defendants do not wish to join. The investigation will continue under Kelly’s direction, with evidence gathering and witness interviews slated to proceed.
James’ office declined to comment further on the petition.
Original reporting: 40/29 / KHBS (NW Arkansas) — read the source article.
